The role of governments in developing health tourism

 

Health tourism development and promotion and State blessing, endorsement, support and commitment should go hand-in-hand. But it should be clear that “government” and “state” are not synonymous.

Governments (and Government Ministers) come and go, not infrequently, even before their term is up. States, on the other hand are permanent, at least, in most cases. In the context of health tourism, we should look to the state and not to governments. This is because the sustainability of health tourism relies on certainty and consistency. Governments are associated with government policies and politics which often change with a change in government.

The role of the State

Right from the beginning, it needs to be pointed out that the role of the State should not be that of the entrepreneur. And of course, the State should in no way compete against the private sector.

One role of the State is that of commercial diplomacy which in the case of health tourism refers to supporting the promotion of businesses and destinations. Diplomacy is the work of the State, and so is Commercial Diplomacy. This is why the State places commercial attachés at their embassies abroad.

Health tourism businesses and destinations feel they should always count on the State for diplomatic support. For example, the United Kingdom Foreign Ministry has officially declared the promotion of British firms as top foreign policy priority. Furthermore, countries should aim to study “economic statecraft”. And maybe countries can take a lesson from the USA which declared June 14 as “Global Economic Statecraft Day”. U.S. embassies around the world use this day to host over 160 events in over 125 countries to encourage connections between American businesses and foreign markets.

The State’s role in stakeholder concerted action initiatives

Development-related stakeholder concerted action initiatives such as development and promotion master plans and the founding of industry representative bodies must not be State creations and certainly, not State-led. Nevertheless, the private sector should be able to rely on State blessing, endorsement, support and commitment for these initiatives.

We should demand that the State be a supporting partner - rather than the leader. And the State should act as the guarantor” of consistency and continuity of the stakeholder concerted action initiatives.

The State, in its effort to demonstrate support and commitment, can co-fund initiatives associated with industry shaping and destination enhancement even if this needs to take the form of a Public Private Partnership (PPP).

What the State must not do
What the State must not do is play the role of entrepreneur. And, in the case of medical tourism, the State must not see medical tourism as a source of revenue for public sector hospitals. As if State intervention, aiming to regulate and legislate, is not enough, we even see governments regarding medical tourism opportunistically. Some Health Ministers think that the development of medical tourism can translate into revenue for public sector hospitals. With this in mind, these ministers aim to formulate regulation and legislation which will drive business to the public hospitals.

During economic recession, when these hospitals are struggling to fulfil their intended role with ever-smaller budgets medical tourism is seen, by some, as a solution. Of course, this is simplistic thinking and wrong and in practice, does not provide the hoped for financial solution.

With regards to medical tourism, the role of the State is to provide healthcare to its own citizens as part of a National Health System. The State should also ensure that the infrastructure is in place which will allow the private sector to develop medical tourism to address international patients. The government’s benefit should be in the form of taxes collected from private sector medical tourism activity. Nothing more... nothing less.

The State in destination creation

Creating contemporary health tourism destinations is to a large degree, about the private sector investing to develop the Industry (also known as “industry shaping”). But the State is also a decision-making and investment-making stakeholder. Consequently, the industry needs to have faith, trust and confidence that the State will “do its bit”. The private sector, before it invests, expects the State to demonstrate its approval, support and commitment. We expect the State to:

  •     Provide legislative and regulatory consistency and certainty.
  •     Contribute to infrastructure development.

Contemporary destination creation begins with industry and typically involves implementation of a 5-stage module project:

  •     Segmentation
  •     Integration
  •     Administration
  •     Development
  •     Promotion

Within this context, supportive governments interested in the development of health tourism – should put money where their mouth is by, at least, funding the first two steps of the project. Industry will then have the confidence and motivation to fund the other three.

Of course, after industry shaping which makes a destination integrated, efficient and competitive, the destination will need to undergo further development in the form of enhancement in order to develop competitive advantage. But this is a story for another day.

Does health tourism need special legislation? …for its development and promotion

At the very start, it needs to be pointed out that the “development, provision and promotion of services, in the context of Health Tourism” (which includes Medical Tourism), does not require Sector-specific Legislation.

As it is, the development, promotion and offering of services is happening – totally legally.

Health Tourism is about Health-related services and travel – both of which are already adequately regulated.

I also want to point out that none of the successful Health Tourism Destinations started out by first formulating Legislation (and very few have any, even today).

The role of legislation …to remove rather than introduce obstacles

Of course, where we may need some purpose-specific legislation, is when current legislation obstructs – or does not adequately encourage – development.

Any National Regulation or Legislation should be “enabling” – aiming to facilitate and empower the private sector.

I urge politicians not to legislate for the sake of “regulating” and in the process, stifle innovation and development (through senseless and counter-productive bureaucracy).

In the context of Health Tourism, the primary objective of legislation should be to “enable” rather than to “regulate”.

“Enabling Legislation” can of course, be introduced to beat the competition.

This, though, needs to be considered with much care and thought – because it can backfire.

For example, we have seen in the relaxation of rules and regulations – in certain countries - pertaining to Assisted Reproduction.

Other examples include the permitting of medical practices banned in other countries, such as experimental treatments and the performing of transplant surgery with “bought” organs.

Often, government intervention (in the form of regulation and legislation) is a poorly-veiled reactive initiative to protect vested “influential” interests (usually, interests of politically connected incumbents).

I have witnessed instances where new “enabling” legislation was opposed by entrenched incumbents (fearing disruption to their lucrative business by new entrants).

Reality has taught us that incumbents often have powerful connections – which are used to enforce and retain market-distorting and anti-competitive practices.

Some examples of helpful legislation

Legislation permitting “change of use”

Several countries today have an abundance of “legacy”, redundant and under-occupied facilities (mainly, in the tourism and hospitality sectors).

In practice, simply scrapping these is either not feasible or not desirable.

So the dilemma and conundrum arises: “what to do with them?”

Of course, the simple and obvious answer is to “re-purpose” them (change of use).

And, often, the idea is to find a way to allow these facilities to offer health-related services.

But, as one can imagine, wanting to repurpose a facility can run into legal obstacles.

We are seeing this scenario being played out in several European countries with “legacy facilities”.

This is where new, “law-modifying” legislation is required.

From “In-patient Treatment” to “Day Case”

In some countries, certain cases which traditionally required “hospitalization” (in-patient treatment”) treating these on a “day case” basis is “illegal”.

Of course, this is an absurdity in the law – and an example where the law does not follow the progress in Medical Science and Technology.

Nevertheless, and not surprisingly, some private hospitals (which earn part of their profits by providing “hotel accommodation”) are opposed to the scrapping of this antiquated law.

But in the end, logic and the demands of the “informed” market will prevail – although it may still require protracted lobbying and political will.

Health Tourism Visas

“Ease of Entry” to a Health Tourism Destination is a big “make or break” issue.

The increase in cross-border terrorism and illegal immigration is more and more reversing the trend in international travel liberalization.

Some Medical Tourism “destinations” have addressed this by legislating the issuing of Medical Tourism Visas (although, countries such as India, are having second thoughts).

Subsidizing Medical Tourism

Turkey is one country which is providing “cash” incentives (a set sum for each International Patient treated) to encourage the growth of Medical Tourism.

And Turkey, is also subsidizing the Certification and Accreditation of Hospitals and Clinics which aim to attract international patients.

Greece is another country which has legislated the provision of incentives (in various forms) to encourage “investment and development” - which though not explicitly for Medical Tourism or Health Tourism – can, nevertheless, be used for such purposes.

Overcoming “Zoning Restrictions”

Not infrequently, plans for new Health Tourism Development, which objectively “makes sense”, run up against existing zoning restrictions.

We just hope that enlightened politicians step in to resolve impasses.

Over-regulation in Europe

The author of the article ends with the message: now is the time to begin removing self-inflicted barriers to job creation and service innovation.

Surprisingly – and against all logic - in Europe (where the need for job creation and innovation is more pressing), the current tendency is to do the opposite – through over-regulation.

FURTHER CONTENT PUBLISHED BY THIS AUTHOR

Amateur to professional

Articles, 01 August, 2018

Medical tourism clusters are not in the right league

“Fragmentistan Syndrome”

Articles, 01 March, 2017

The “Fragmentistan Syndrome” in medical tourism

Industry Representative Bodies

Articles, 31 January, 2017

The raison d'être of Health Tourism Industry Representative Bodies

Health tourism improvements

Articles, 21 September, 2016

Making health tourism “truly” sustainable and resilient – for all

The rise of domestic medical tourism

Articles, 10 December, 2015

Why more and more medical tourism business is becoming “domestic”

Insurance funded treatment abroad

Articles, 15 October, 2015

The future of “Health-Plan-Funded” treatment abroad

A fortune in pyramids

Articles, 12 June, 2015

Is there a fortune at the bottom of the medical tourism pyramid?

Saying NO

Articles, 24 November, 2014

Why some countries are turning their back on medical tourism.

"Buyers" at events

Articles, 07 August, 2014

Hosted "Buyers" fail to live up to expectations

Who leads "Health Tourism Destinations"?

Articles, 22 May, 2014

Are there leaders, or does he who pays, speaks?

The Russian Patient

Articles, 22 April, 2014

Russia is the new focus for medical tourist companies.

Why "Google Health" failed

Articles, 09 January, 2014

Examining the electronic health record "Death Trap"

Greece as a destination

Articles, 29 November, 2013

Times are changing as Greece tries to become a major destination.

Luxury and Medicine

Articles, 07 October, 2013

If medical tourism is all about cost, why so many luxury destinations?

Conventional bankruptcy

Articles, 27 August, 2013

The old models have failed, but what replaces them?

Haves and wants

Articles, 12 April, 2013

How have to travel is being replaced by wanting to travel

Changing motivations

Articles, 01 February, 2013

Is medical tourism experiencing a shift from 'have to' to 'want to'

Discovering medical tourism

Articles, 22 October, 2012

Despite the recession, there's still growth in medical tourism

Tourism "free zones"

Articles, 01 June, 2012

What are the goals and benefits?

International medical children

Articles, 18 May, 2012

How the EU directive may stimulate an increase in child care

On ice?

Articles, 23 April, 2012

Dr Constantine Constantinides talks on the EU directive on Cross Border Healthcare

Short/long term

Articles, 06 March, 2012

Which should we focus on in medical tourism

Survivor bias

Articles, 23 January, 2012

Past success is no predictor of future eminence

Healthcare standards

Articles, 21 October, 2011

Do standards need to have a regional flavour?

Is it enough?

Articles, 28 September, 2011

Can medical tourism on its own be sustainable?

Understanding the market

Articles, 03 June, 2011

Why would you want to get into the medical tourism market?

Exploring the health tourism market

Articles, 28 January, 2011

Constantine Constantinides provides advice as to understanding the health tourism market

Government incentives for health tourism

Articles, 29 November, 2010

Constantine Constantinides speaks on the role of government in medical travel

Failure?

Articles, 26 August, 2010

Constantine Constantinides talks on why medical tourism businesses fail

Should accreditation be sold

Articles, 29 July, 2010

Constantine Constantinides talks on how should handle Destination Marketing

Blowing their own trumpet

Articles, 26 February, 2010

Is there any noise from the market, or is it all in the industry?

Brightest Africa

Articles, 20 January, 2010

Is Africa always a exporter, or can it be a healthcare destination?

Cross-border opposition

Articles, 10 December, 2009

Spain and other nations blocked the draft proposal, we ask the experts why

The resentment factor

Articles, 15 October, 2009

Health tourism is often resented by countries, but can it have positive effects?

Free and open debate

Articles, 22 September, 2009

Constantine Constantinides voices concern over the expression of opinions in the industry

Medical tourism in denial

Articles, 30 July, 2009

Supply is exceeding demand in medical tourism, but the industry is in denial

Advertisement

ADD AN ARTICLE

Do you have an article that you’d like to share with the medical travel industry?

Publish for FREE on IMTJ.

ADD ARTICLE

Related Articles

“Sensitive” practices in medical tourism

08 November, 2019

Assessing research on assisted reproduction and abortion

Regulating India’s stem cell clinics

27 August, 2019

Is stem cell treatment legal in India?

Visas and medical travel

01 May, 2019

Could visa rules deter medical tourists?

UK non-surgical cosmetic surgery

18 April, 2019

UK non-surgical cosmetic market: a crisis waiting to happen?

Healthcare quality improvement

20 February, 2019

International accreditation requires CQI: what is it?